Conservative politicians generally seem to agree that the government should not be in the business of providing any sort of assistance to unemployed or impoverished Americans. Let the churches do that, they say. By shifting this burden from the government to the faith-based sector, they aim to relieve the wealthiest 2% of most of their tax burden and shrink the size of government (at least in certain areas to which they are ideologically opposed).
But look at what happens if we play this scenario out. The public has to count on churches to provide the safety net. These are the same churches the conservative politicians would like to free from any sort of regulations about who they hire and who they may choose to help. Aid comes with strings attached once churches are so freed. The government cannot discriminate; churches would have few such constraints.
Being a fiscal conservative who prefers a smaller government is one thing; supporting policies that would require the needy to grovel before the churches to receive aid is something else entirely. It seems like a plan designed to bypass the wall between church and state.