Image by Orbital Joe via Flickr
Iowa Republican Rep. Steve King, the sponsor of the bill to require the engraving, has claimed that the FFRF's suit is an effort to silence those who want to talk about their religion. This is not at all what is going on, but it does reveal why it is important for us to explain the real issues.
Rep. King also claims that the FFRF is trying to strip the U.S. of our religious heritage.
I think in the end it makes it more clear what they are trying to do and that strengthens my case and the case of people who want to have an accurate depiction of history.Again, that is not what is happening here. The FFRF and those of us who support their efforts are opposed to the engraving for the following reasons:
- Placing "In God We Trust" on a government building amounts to blatantly unconstitutional endorsement of religion by the government (i.e., a violation of the Establishment Clause).
- The U.S. government is tasked with representing the people - not just those who believe in gods - but all the people.
- "In God We Trust" is not an accurate statement. Many Americans do indeed trust in god(s); many others do not believe in any god(s).
- "In God We Trust" is inherently exclusionary. It defines the in-group as those who believe in a particular god and excludes everyone else.
- The fact that "In God We Trust" became the national motto of the U.S. in 1956 no more implies that it is part of our national heritage than the fact that many of our "founding fathers" owned slaves implies that slavery is part of our national heritage.
Tags: