Well before the mainstream media decided that atheism was worth examining and begin to report on a "new atheism," atheist bloggers were discussing the appropriate tone of atheist discourse. This discussion has intensified, becoming one of the hot topics within our growing community. How aggressive should atheists be in opposing religion? If we become too aggressive, don't we run the risk of becoming the very fundamentalists we oppose? In this post, I will examine the possibility of "atheist extremism," whether it is possible, and how we would recognize it.
I am going to start with the premise that is is at least possible for atheists to become too assertive/aggressive/militant/extreme in their views and or behavior. If you disagree with this, try to suspend judgment until the end of the post. What might this look like, and what are we to call such an atheist?
Fundamentalist or Militant Atheism
The first term with which we can easily dispense is that of "fundamentalist atheist." It is quite clear to me that there can be no such thing as atheist fundamentalism, and I will refer you to my previous post on this issue. In a nutshell, religious fundamentalism is about adherence to a particular doctrine, atheism has no doctrine, and therefore, there can be no fundamentalist atheism. For more on fundamentalist atheism, I encourage you to read this post at The One With Aldacron or this post at The Uncredible Hallq.
"Militant atheism" is probably the second most popular term used to describe over-the-top atheists. Is it any more viable than "fundamentalist atheism?" It initially appears so, but there are at least two problems with this label. First, militancy is virtually always used to describe a pattern of behavior rather than a viewpoint. Thus, "militant Christian" or "militant Muslim" conjures the image of someone who engages in militant acts. Second, "militant" implies violence. When The Uncredible Hallq searched Google for these terms, he found that they were used primarily to depict persons or groups engaged in violence. This hardly fits any group of American atheists I've encountered.
Atheist Extremism
I suggest that "atheist extremism" is the term we have been seeking. It carries no requirement of adherence to a particular doctrine, and it does not imply violence. But what does it mean, and what would an atheist extremist look like?
The atheist extremist would hold views which would be considered extreme by most members of the atheist community. Like any other type of extremist, an atheist extremist would be irrational. This irrationality would be manifest through cognitive errors such as (and not limited to) the following:
Through irrationality, the atheist extremist would maintain his or her position by selectively focusing on supportive evidence while ignoring or explaining away contradictory evidence. Attempts to question his or her worldview would be experienced as personal attacks and would solidify extreme positions. Such an individual would form an intense emotional attachment to his or her viewpoint which would override that justified by evidence and reason.
I have not encountered many atheists like this, but I have come across a few. I don't believe they are common, but I do believe they exist. Like extremists of other brands, they have stopped thinking and exist simply to argue a viewpoint they may no longer be able to articulate.
Note that what I have described here bears little resemblance to Harris, Dawkins, or other prominent atheists accused of being too extreme. These prominent authors to express controversial opinions, but they are opinions with which the vast majority of atheist agree and opinions which are supported with the exercise of reason.
Tags: atheist, atheism, religion, extremism, religious extremism, atheist extremism
